Telmarc

  Gardens

   Notes 2007Home Up
 

Home
Up

 

 

 

 

 

 

These are notes from the Garden and may be of interest and possible use to other Daylily Gardeners.

December 23, 2007

Well, we are at the end of another year, but the seedlings from our 2007 crosses are now beginning to arise. We are now off again. For those of us who hybridize all but mid November to mid December is the off season. From now on we watch, we water, we feed, and we protect the little things, especially from the squirrels who seem to like basking on my seed beds under the lamps and over the heating pads. How they get in I will never know. But this year we have put netting over them seeds and hopefully will get some protection, and even provide a nicer and dryer bed for the squirrels.

 

The seeds are bursting forth just after seven days of being in their beds. We have well over 1500 seeds in the beds and they are treated with an anti fungal as well as a quick grow fertilizer. Then we cap them until they come out, then remove the caps and let them grow under the netting.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The one week growth is an average of seven out of 72 seed units. This is typical for the daylily. Full germination will take about four weeks. Anything not germinated by that time will most likely never germinate.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

So Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all who have been reading this. And, Oh yes, there is another squirrel whose story will appear soon, it is Seamus the Squirrel, for it has been this fat and furry creature who has been relaxing on my beds. So Merry Christmas to you Seamus, to you Antnee, you Mr. Red Bottom, and all the others who have befriended me in the past years!

 

 

 

 

 

December 15, 2007

We planted almost 1,500 seeds today after three months of cold stratifying. The results below show the distribution of Number of Seeds per pod. There were an average of 12.66 seed per pod.

In the graph below we seed a very long tail distribution. The long tails are dominated by crosses with species plants, which almost always yield high seed count when crossed with hybrids.

Our next step is to grow the seedlings till mid March, when the go out for hardening off, and then in mid April they go into pots. We have snow cover now, and have had it for almost two weeks, average temp has been around 29 F at 8 AM. The pots from 04, 05, and 06 are wrapped in plastic netting and then stuffed with leaves for insulation. We had tested a group last winter and they performed well. This will be the first major tests for large scale potted plants.

October 18, 2007

Fall has been quite benign so far, no frosts, and we still have H flava re-blooming. The samples taken today are shown below:

The close-up of the pollen is shown below. The flower is quite fragrant but the scapes on the re-blooms are short. We also have second re-bloom of the Stella, first time we have ever observed this effect.

Below are the buds. Note the wide and somewhat short bracts at the base of the non branched buds.

 

October 1, 2007

The following Charts depict some interesting results. We have plotted the absolute number and percents for; crosses, seeds, seedlings, year 1 plants, year 2 plants, and introductions. Typically we get 10 seeds per pod, thus 250 pods would yield 2500 seeds, but not seedlings.

The following is the percent chart.

September 18, 2007

We have cut down all of the plants and cleaned up the soil in preparation for the oncoming winter. The temperature has already dipped into the upper 30s so we can expect a frost in a couple of weeks.

We have one plant, a Sara's Wink X Tixie which was done in 2005 which has an interesting re-bloom. On June 17, 2007 we obtained the following bloom:

Then on September 18, 2007 we obtained the following bloom on the same plant:

This now has an eyezone, faint but attractive. It has two branches, and three buds per branch, is very fragrant and is 25" tall and 3" flower. We will look at this again next year. The lateness of the re-bloom is amazing. We have Sandra Elizabeth being the latest bloom, which is the end of August. This is a strong and aggressive bloom. As with any new flower we must wait at least until the second year to see if it repeats.

 

August 12, 2007

We are down to a few last minute crosses, Sandra Elizabeth and Krakatoa Lava being the stalwarts. The following is a list for possible introduction next year. There are some interesting crosses with species here.

This is Love Festival X Superchild. We tried color and size as well as late bloom. We achieve the first two, this is a mid bloom flower. This was done in 1997 and we have been watching it for a while.
This is a 1999 cross of Chicago Picoteed Queen X Royal Fantasy. It has good size and an attractive eye zone.
This is a 2001 cross of Karen Sue X American Belle. I had tried to get the bi color of a Karen Sue which I have used before but this is an attractive red with eye zone.
This is a 2001 cross of (Whoperee X Royal Kingdom) X Wine Bold. It yields a deep red bloom of a large size. It has a rich orange throat.
This is a 2004 cross of Whoperee X Small Prize. It is a strong bloomer and rich color. We like the reds and keep trying to generate variety and blooming length.
This is a 2004 cross of Savannah Seacrest Beauty X Marlin's Magic. It yields a deep red and good eyezone with recurved petals.
This is a 2004 cross of Love Festival X Cynthia Paige Platais. It is very attractive and stands out dramatically in the collection of other flowers.
This is a 2004 cross as follows:

H. citrina X (94 (92 (Karen Sue X Hyperion) X Hyperion)

It is a rich red double. I have no idea how using citrina and Hyperion we ever attained this. It blooms well and the only source of color was Karen Sue. WE started this process in 1992, then 1994 and again in 2004.

This is H citrina X H aurantiaca. This has a 51" scape with two branches and 11 flowers per branch. It is very fragrant and blooms in the day. It had several sister plants all colored by the aurantiaca. This is pure yellow and looks very promising! This is a great spider and stands out very well.
This is Mallard X Mallard. I have been watching this one for several years. I have begun to like the doubles and this one is a very good bloomer and very attractive.
This is unknown. It is larger than Nona's Garnett Spider and blooms latter. I found this in my throw away seed patch at the edge of the driveway. It just kept growing and coming back so I moved it in.

 

August 4, 2007

The season is ending and the seed pods are forming. I have shown eight species and their pods below.

H citrina

H minor (Apps)

H altissima (Olallie)

H. aurantiaca

H coreana

H hakuensis

H multiflora

H thunbergerii

August 1, 2007

The following are some detailed descriptions of H coreana and H altissima. We are nearing the end of the season. We have been battling the H fulva Europa infestation and despite double digging the display beds they seem to come back again and again. It is no wonder that they are now deemed invasive in many states.

The picture to the left is H coreana. Note the bracts just above mid scape. There also is no branching in the flower and the color is a bright yellow, almost chrome. This picture with the shadow gives a good presentation of the H coreana.
The full scape for H coreana is shown to the left. It shows the bracts and the budding and the splitting of the buds at then end of the scape.
H altissima is shown to the left. Note the clear branching of the scape. The scape is about 65-75 inches in height. This plant does not like transplanting. I moved them all at the end of lat year and this is the only scape this year. There is excellent leaf growth but the flowering mechanism seem to dislike any movement. I have seen this in the past.
This is my H altissima flower. Note the reddish coloring near the throat. I suspect this is some variant but in all other elements it is clearly an H altissima.

 

July 30, 2007

We now have several H coreana. They are shown below. We also have H thunbergii from an alternative source. They bloomed three weeks latter than Apps.

The flower is shown to the left. There is no branching but the flower is not sessile. There is considerable budding and the flower is a yellow orange color.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The flower opens up fully and shows strong structure and display characteristics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The mid scape has the characteristic bracts which are generally several inches in length. The bracts are thin and are very pointed in a gradual manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The budding is shown in a closer view to the left. Note we see about five buds per branch at the end and two divisions of sets of five.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 28, 2007

We have been managing the daylilies in New Hampshire and they bloom about three weeks latter than in northern New Jersey and six weeks latter than southern New Jersey. Again we are interested in the issue of flower bloom. We know that it is a combination of temperature and daylight. Stay tuned, we will do the analysis this fall. Below shows the New Hampshire garden, although latter to bloom it grows at 2 to 3 times the rate here in northern New Jersey.

 

July 25, 2007

The following picture is of four flowers from citrina, aurantiaca, fulva (species NOT Europa), and hakuensis.

Note the branching. H aurantiaca is clearly reddish in tint and H citrina is closing from the night before. H hakuensis is branched.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here is my standard altissima. It has the tint in the center but it blooms at the end of July and it is 6' tall. I moved a cluster last fall into two locations. I have only one scape. This plant is very sensitive to moving and hopefully we will get many scapes again next year.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 22, 2007

Today the Garden State Daylily Growers went to Apps for the last time. He closes next week on the 29th. Dr. Apps was kind enough to take the entire membership on a complete tour of the fields and hybridizing areas. Shown below are some of the highlights.

July 18, 2007

The following are H Coreana buds. They are just coming out on several species plants and we had one flower today but it was badly beaten up by the very heavy rains.

Note the large bracts on the H coreana. These seem to be typical of the species. The ones which will bloom this year are their first yea as compared to others which we have. It may take a few years to see normal growth but the characteristics seem stable.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Note also on the bud there are noticeable bracts as well. Here we see a non-branched set of buds, about an average of four per scape.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Here we see all of the buds and that there appears to be no branching either.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We have also seen our normal H altissima start to have full scapes. It may take another three weeks before we see the standard bloom. The Olallie plants are clearly not altissima. The Olallie plants were very costly and were in our opinion the wrong plant. I am trying to identify it now.

July 16, 2007

We have had the Open House this past weekend and we hosted the Garden State Daylilies Growers and the Florham Park Garden Club as well as others. The weather was superb and all seemed to enjoy the display which is slowly approaching a peak.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 12, 2007

We have also been taking pictures of pods and we present a few here.

This is H citrina pod. Note the dark end of the pod. We have been told that H citrina is self sterile. I have not been able to confirm this yet but will try this summer. H citrina grows very aggressively in this garden environment.

 

 

 

 

 

This is H flava the lemon daylily. It is also an oblate looking pod with very rough texture on the surface.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is H minor. It is a very long pod and hangs on the thin drooping scape.

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is H altissima (Olallie) and we provide this here solely for latter comparison. Our older H altissimas are now sending out scapes and as usual and as with true altissimas they are quite long and will be in excess of 6 feet in height. Nothing should be observed from this alleged altissima until we can validate it after a second season.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 8, 2007

The Open House will be in a week and we present here a preview of the display garden. There are still many buds and about only 40% of the plants have flowered. We have added a few new ones from Apps. There are over 500 hybrids now in the collection.

 

July 7, 2007

Purchased many items yesterday from Apps for hybridizing. Also bought out his species since he is retiring at then end of this season. He will be sorely missed. One was H thunbergerii as shown below. I have had some of these before but not quite like this. I trust Apps for his identification, probably one of the best in the US. Note it is highly branched and a bright yellow flower. It blooms early in Apps' area, which is 3 weeks earlier than where we are in northern New Jersey, Zone 5 versus Zone 6-7.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 5, 2007

This is a cross from 2004. It is 7" across and is a magnificent 4N flower. It just bloomed today and was crossed in 2004 on July 4th. Some of the other older crosses may be kept but many as usual will see the Mountains in New Hampshire.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

July 2, 2007

We have been collecting specimens on inflorescences of Hemerocallis and the following table presents some;

 

H altissima (Olallie)

This is H altissima from Olallie. It is short and blooms much too early. I suspect it is not altissima as the altissima that I have is 70-80" in height and blooms late. As I noted I lost 2 of the Olallie plants, and the others were marginal at best.

H multiflora

 

This is classic multiflora. Note the aggressive branching. If possible I will be using this in some crosses with 2N hybrids to see if I can get branching.

H minor (Apps, Siberia)

This is a let bloomer for a minor and the leaves seem a bit too erect as does the inflorescence.

H flava

 

Classic flava form from Apps. Note the bracts and the almost sessile ends.

H citrina

Classic citrina. There is slight branching and 3 buds per branch. The ends of the citrina buds have a dark brown or red color.

H hakuensis

 

Limited branching and the same 3 bud formation.

H fulva

Classic fulva, not the 3N but the species.

H aurantiaca

This is a branched form with the 3 bud formation.

June 22, 2007

The garden is starting to bloom. The H citrina from Olallie Nursery is blooming. This is quite early for Citrina since most of the one we have had bloom in mid July. However it has all the characteristics of the citrina except for an early bloom. We have had less than satisfactory plants from Olallie, we lost the minors, and a few others. Also the plant size when shipped was small. Best still is from Apps and Manatawny Creek Farm. Manatawny is especially generous and their plants come is great condition. We pick the Apps plants up directly from his place in southern New Jersey. Since this is his last year it is really worth a trip no matter how far!

 

 

 

We also have Mikado, the Stout hybrid. It is yellow with an eyezone. Other than the bloom time I cannot distinguish it from Buckeye another Stout hybrid.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finally we had a deer attack last night. They jumped over the fence and played havoc with Hostas and the wild 3N flavas. I had sprayed but did not do so for over a week and it rained heavily three times. The front unprotected by fence garden is sprayed with a different spray every other day and the 300 pound rodents have not touched it in three years. Thus, no matter what we recommend a rotating spray. We use Hinder, Deer Off, Liquid Fence, and a collection of other concoctions. There is no one sustainable solution.

June 12, 2007

We have plotted the Average Temperature and Rainfall for the past seventeen years. Interesting, no temperature increase at all but dramatic variation in annual rainfall which has as significant an impact on flowering.

 

We have also plotted Bloom Excess time, which is actual time less average versus the Temperature as shown below:

Note that in the above we have a negative slope showing a shorter bloom time, namely earlier as a function of temperature. Thus we would argue that bloom time is a potential predictor of average temperature.

We have done the same but now as a function of rain in inches as shown below:

The relationship is not close in this analysis. Although the more rain the earlier the bloom time the reliability of this fit is very poor.

June 11, 2007

The daylilies are starting to bloom. We have obtained the first Stout plant today, Buckeye.

The above is the H minor (Apps, Siberia) bloom. It was the first day of the bloom of this plant which I planted last summer. One should not that unlike the other H minor I have the scapes of this one are branched and they are upright. My other H minor are non branched and flop. The leaves are thin and the scape is twice the leave length.

 

This has a light yellow color and good scent. It blooms early in the morning.
Above is the H minor Siberia and its budding. Above is the H flava also from Apps and its budding. Note the clear difference between the two plants. The H flava is sessile with short thick bracts.
Above is Buckeye a Stout hybrid. It is small and has a brownish tint on the petals. I will try crossing this with some of my more recent hybrids. The problem is that is the first of the Stout hybrids I received this year to bloom.

 

Above is the classic Orange Prelude. It is the first bloom for the year of our regular hybrids.

June 9, 2007

We have been watching the two species received from Apps last year. They are H flava and H minor (Siberia) The following is as of today.

The H flava shown above has a brownish color on the sepals. We had not seen this on the first bloom. It is also quite fragrant and blooms initially in later afternoon. The flower lasts more than a day and is a strong yellow color.

 

The flowers are sessile but there is the formation of a secondary sessile bud below the first. The appear in groups of four.
The H minor from Siberia is shown above/ Note the number of ants. It must be secreting sugars to attract the ants. This was taken at about 19:00. Also note the bracts on the buds. To the left is a second set of buds as well.

 

Above we have H minor as to the left. Note the clear branching. We noticed that for the first time today. On our other H minor there was no branching.
To the left is the H flava. Note the bracts at the base and compare to H minor.

 

June 7, 2007

The Canary in the Mine Shaft ("How well is it doing")

Having data on bloom time for fifteen years now I decided to do a simple analysis of the global warming phenomenon. The premise is that if bloom time at a certain location for a certain flower is influenced primarily by total heat input, namely the average temperature over a period of time, assuming the daylight hours are the same, one would expect to see a shift to earlier bloom times in a wide selection of what I have called sentinel flowers. A fifteen years window, given the warming which has been predicted would be more than adequate. I have seen no research on this issue which surprises me. One always looks for a long term average predictor. For example in medicine for Type 2 Diabetes one monitors glycosolated hemeglobin, HgA1B, which is a sixty day average of blood glucose. It is the medical analog to bloom time.

Thus I chose a few plants which I have monitored bloom time for. I plotted bloom time by year as shown below. One can then model the bloom time as a function of average temperature per year. Namely:

Bloom Time (Days from January 1 of that year) =

m Average Temp (for that year) + b

Performing a regression analysis one looks for the slope. Namely, we assume we have constant m and b, so that the slope is dependent on an average temperature. The chart below shows this for several hybrids. If the slope is positive then the average temperature is increasing. If the slope is negative then the average temperature is decreasing.

We did then did this analysis for many hybrids and we obtained the rate of change of bloom time in days for each year. What we obtained was the chart shown below:

Here the plants are named and the y axis is the slope measured in days of bloom change per 365 days. Thus a negative value of  -0.001 is a shortening in 0.365 days per year in bloom time and a positive value +0.001 is a lengthening of the  bloom time of 0.365 days per year. Thus we see above that Superchild is having an earlier bloom time over the past fifteen years of a significant amount, -0.003 per year, which is almost a day a year! We then performed a statistical analysis on the slopes and within a 95% confidence interval the average slope is shown below:

Plant Slope
H dumortieri -0.0006
Big Bird 0.0001
Brindlee Beauty -0.0003
Brutus 0.0001
Chicago Atlas 0.0011
Chicago Brave 0.0001
Decatur Apricot 0.0021
Hyperion 0.0004
Jog On -0.0005
Karen Sue -0.0006
Mallard 0.0008
Orange Prelude -0.0011
Prairie Blue Eyes -0.0007
Roy Beaver -0.0016
Superchild -0.0031
 
Average -0.0003

Thus we do NOT see any significant effects of a warming on the basis of flower time. This is based on a large sample of fifteen years duration. In fact we see a slight shortening of the time, albeit small, thus implying a warming but not a very significant one. It would be interesting to see if this can be applied in a broader manner.

June 2, 2007

The H flava from Apps bloomed today. It is shown below. May has been very hot with several days well above 90 F.

The above shows the H flava that we received from Apps last fall. This is our first flava plant and it does appear to look a great deal like the minor but the difference is that the leaves are much wider and the scape stands upright. Since this is the first year of a bloom the timing may not be normal but if it is then the timing is about two weeks latter than minor.

The above shows the buds for H flava. There are small stems extending above the scape and they appear in groups of 2. Also there is a bract below the budding area.
The above shows the bud for the H minor from Apps which is a Siberian H minor. This is about three weeks behind the H minors I have in the garden from years past. It may take another week to bloom. Like all the other recent species this may not be blooming at a normal time because of the transplant shock.

 

The above is the bud for H fulva, the common daylily. Note the large bract that is common to this sterile plant. They are all in bud and we use them for naturalizing, although they are now considered an invasive species.
The bud of H fulva, the common daylily is shown in detail in the photo to the right.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 28, 2007

We now have all three species in bloom. I have tried to compare them for easy identification. First is the H dumortieri species as shown below:

Note the following:

1. on the pictures bellow one can see that the back of the sepals we see the dark reddish brown tint. The petals are pure yellow.

2. The buds are clusters with bracts at the base.

3. The H dumortieri seems to bloom a week after the H middendorfii. The H middendorfii however is a great grower from seeds and flowers now in large clumps.

Now we have also tried to compare the flowers.

 

The three flowers are shown to the left and also below. From the left we have H middendorfii, H dumortieri, and H minor. Note first the color. The middendorfii are an orange color. This color seems to breed true on the plants which I have It is a good plant to grow from seed, in fact the best I have seen. I now line the driveway with them and they have a large group of flowers on each plant. Then the dumortieri which is yellow, and slightly darker yellow than the minor. The minor is a pale yellow with no tints on either sepals or petals. Also minor has grass like leaves.
Here we can see minor on left, then dumortieri, and then middendorfii. The tint on the sepals of the dumortieri are quite evident in this picture. Also we see the middendorfii petals and sepals opening in a wide bursting manner on many of the plants.
This is another view of the above but with the scale along the horizontal.

We have also seen our large patch of H fulva in bud, and this is early for them. We also have H minor from Siberia courtesy of Darrell Apps in bud and H flava is also budding. Finally we have June Wine in bud as well. Generally we get Orange Prelude the first week in June in bloom but no sign as of yet.

May 24, 2007

H dumortieri has bloomed. It is shown to the left. Note the dark reddish brown sepals and the chrome petals. The difference between dumortieri and middendorfii should be clear with this one characteristic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The dumortieri seen below also show several characteristics. First there are bracts mid scape as shown on bottom right. Second, the buds are sessile, no branching, and the buds show the reddish tint as well. It is very prominent just before flowering.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Also we see that H minor is really a night bloomer and is quite fragrant. The plant is a very sensitive bloomer, just a few scapes per plant and the plant does not seem to propagate as well as others. We can also see that there are just two buds per scape, with a small bract and the buds are fairly sessile. I have noticed that it blooms at the end of the day and the peak openness is just after sunset. I have been hybridizing these as well.

 

 

 

 

 

The minor has a very slight branching and is not clearly sessile. The flower opens greatly at night and closes down in the day time. We notice only two buds per scape and the strong yellow is very attractive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 23, 2007

H middendorfii bloomed on 21 May 2004, a full week latter than in 2006. The blooms are shown below. The flower is a chrome yellow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The flowers are shown above and to the left. The chrome yellow is quite prominent. The flowers are sessile, all clumped to the end of the scape, there is no branching. There are small bracts at the base of the buds and three to four flowers per scape. These plants have all been grown from seed. The H middendorfii seems to grow the best from seed of all the species. I have been able to grow hundreds of these plants and we are now testing them in New Hampshire. The New Hampshire plants are about a week to ten days behind these. However the other New Hampshire plants are three to four weeks behind New Jersey. This may imply that the Hemerocallis is more light dependent and not as reliant on heat as many other species. An interesting observation.

 

 

May 20, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The H minor bloomed today about a week latter than usual. Again it was the exceedingly cold winter. The flower has a clear yellow like color, there is no clear branching and the leaves are quite narrow and grass like. This is the first species to bloom. We have transplanted a large collection of minor to a naturalizing and species display garden and they do not seem to bloom. H minor seems to be a bit fragile in its ability to move. We have planted these in our New Hampshire gardens and will see how well they do in Zone 4.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

May 17, 2007

Buds from the species plants are shown below. It is useful to notice the difference between species at this early stage. There are four species in bud; minor, dumortieri, middendorfii, and minor.

H middendorfii

There s a mild reddish tint but not as dark as dumortieri and the bud is longer.

 

 

 

 

H dumortieri

This bud has a strong reddish tint as would be expected. Compare this to middendorfii which has little if any coloring.

 

 

 

H minor

The bud is very long and narrow with no noticeable bract at the base.

 

 

 

 

 

 

H flava

The bud has a large bract at the base and is appearing as a single bud at this time. This is a flava from Apps which is of Siberian origin. We have not seen this bloom yet.

 

 

 

 

May 14, 2007

The first bloom of the year is H Elfin (F1) which was grown from seed obtained from H Elfin at the New York Botanical Garden. This is the sentinel bloom we see every year, it blooms before any other of the plants. dumortieri and middendorfii are in bud as is minor. We expect the species to bloom shortly. Due to the excessively cold winter we are seeing a delay of 7-10 days in normal blooming. So much for global warming.

We have also seen the loss of several hybrids over the winter. Glimmerglass and Now and Zen have not survived and Ed Brown looks very weak. We would not recommend these in Zone 5 and above, even in northern Zone 6 it is questionable. Our lows this year were 4 F and there was a six week period of deep freeze. The frost line exceeded 8" when measured.

 

 

 

May 13, 2007

We have used pots for our seedlings this year for the first time. The results seem spectacular. We set the seedlings in early December inside on hot beds and let the grow till April 1, then set them outside to harden off. Then in early May we set them in pots. The posts allow denser planting, better control, easier fertilization and weed management. We will report on the results as we progress. We had over-wintered some plants in pots last winter with success so we believe we can do it with the seedlings, as long as we maintain wind damage to roots. We accomplish that through packing them with oak leaves as an insulation.

 

 

 

The individual pot growth has been quite good. We have found that we have more than doubled the rate of growth of the plant in handling them in this manner. The only risk we have is from squirrels who look for seeds in the pots. Early on we had to use a light plastic mesh covering which we have now removed. That approach seems to work quite well. Root growth in the pots, which are using a potting mix, is significant. We use plastic pots to delimit water loss. The pots can be watered every other day if there is no rain. However we have had a wet spring, with 14" of rain in April, four times the normal.

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                          

NOTICE

All documents and materials on this web site are the copyrighted property of Telmarc and can be used solely for individual purposes. Telmarc also does not represent in any manner or fashion that the documents and information contained herein can be used other than for expressing the opinion's of Telmarc and its affiliates. Any use made and actions resulting directly or otherwise from any of the documents, information, suggestions, data or otherwise is the sole responsibility of the user and Telmarc expressly takes no liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use or reliance upon any of Telmarc opinions as herein expressed. There is no representation by Telmarc or its affiliates, express or otherwise, that the materials contained herein are correct, without risk, or in any way should be relied upon by anyone for any purpose. The remarks and information contained herein is only the opinion of Telmarc and its principals and affiliates. Telmarc does not provide any business, regulatory, environmental or similar advice on this website or in its publications.

 

Send mail to tmcgarty@telmarcgardens.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2005-2008 Telmarc Gardens all rights reserved.
Last modified: 05/16/08